Rachel Maddow MSNBC

Rachel Maddow MSNBC

I see political people... (Retweets do not imply endorsement.)

9684548 followers  •  3368 follow  •    •   http://t.co/KtNvfeNDMl

"Court says Big Pharma can be sued as drug dealers" “The common perception of a drug dealer may be that of the street dealer, but... if plaintiffs’ allegations are correct...

"[that] manufacturers knowingly flooded the affected areas with drugs they knew were to be diverted... that is the basis for civil liability whether one’s headquarters is an office building or a back alley.”

"Republicans and Democrats hammer Trump's judicial nominee"

“Projects to upgrade airfields in Germany, Luxembourg, Great Britain, Hungary, and Slovakia have been shelved, leaving the bases unable to support U.S. and NATO airplanes... USAF: “We had no advanced notice of what projects they chose.”

Doctor of Isabel Bueso writing in WaPo — “Immigrants help us find treatments for rare diseases. We owe them for that.”

N.Y. AG: We found $1 billion in Sackler wire transfers, Purdue Pharma owners are 'lowballing' opioid victims


BREAKING: We've got Trump tax returns. Tonight, 9pm ET. MSNBC. (Seriously).

24 million people losing insurance is roughly equivalent to the population of: VT AL ND SD DE MT RI ME NH ID WV NE NM KS WY **combined**.

Ugh, I'm sorry. If nothing else, it is my job to actually be able to speak while I'm on TV. What I was trying to do -- when I suddenly couldn't say/do anything -- was read this lede: 1/6

“I have a very big dog in my office, and if you don’t be quiet, he will come out and bite you! Want me to go get the dog? I will bring the dog out. Do you want him to bite you?” The judge continued to yell at the *2-year old* boy throughout the hearing.

Finally. And now, forgive me, but how on earth did this happen in the first place, and how is it that everyone who was even remotely involved in it is not resigning.

Literally the subject line is "spying" and the first line is "I have a friend who is a mole for us." Forwarded by Kavanaugh personally, who calls it "interesting". Then, under oath, he denied knowing of any "spying" or "mole," said he would've reported it if he'd heard of that.

Now they're trying to tell Native Americans in Sioux County SD that their votes will be disqualified on the basis of the *color of the ink* they use to vote. Apparently they're going to throw everything they've got at this. Just astonishing.