Delhi riots: Court says 100 suspicions don’t make a proof The court had earlier observed according to criminal jurisprudence, there must be some material against the accused persons to frame a charge. Read: via @TOIDelhi
As far as Disha's arrest is concerned, it was done as per the procedures. Law doesn't differentiate between a 22-yr-old & a 50-yr-old. She was produced before a court which sent her to 5-day Police custody. It's false when people say that there were lapses in the arrest: Delhi CP
Delhi: A woman was given triple talaq by her husband in June 2020 after she did not give birth to a son. He also refused to provide her with an allowance for maintenance. The couple has two daughters, aged 20 and 18. The woman, Huma Hashim, has approached the court in this matter
A Delhi court directs police to issue 10 day pre-arrest notice to Shehla Rashid if the need arises to arrest her in the alleged case of defaming Indian Army on social media, while disposing of her anticipatory bail application.
Good to learn that at last CBI moved the Delhi High Court to seek urgent and early hearing of the 2G appeal against Judge Saini’s acquittal of Raja and Maran
I welcome Delhi High Court verdict convicting Sajjan Kumar in 1984 riots case. It has been a very long n painful wait for innocent victims who were murdered by those in power. Nobody involved in any riot should be allowed to escape no matter how powerful the individual maybe.