If you're a 2nd Amendment absolutist, how you can be in favor of laws that prevent people from shooting others with the weapons they bear? That's an obvious infringement of your right to use your gun as you see fit. Why is it constitutional?
The point is that no rational person thinks the "shall not be infringed" clause of the 2nd Amendment really means "shall not be infringed under in any way or under any circumstances." So the only question is where you draw the line.
ONE LESS: Scott Pappalardo owned his AR-15 rifle for more than 30 years. He even has a Second Amendment tattoo on his arm. This weekend, he destroyed his gun “to make sure this weapon will be ever be able to take a life.”
LIBERATE VIRGINIA, and save your great 2nd Amendment. It is under siege!