Results for SCOTUS

Add to feed Create your own feed


Wisconsin Republicans have used the worst public health crisis of our lifetime as an opportunity to deprive Wisconsin residents of their right to vote. SCOTUS gave a green light to this voter suppression.

If you don't like Rule by Trump Judges, there is just one option: expand the Supreme Court. There is no other way to make these bigoted, malicious, partisan jurists follow the law. We can either reform SCOTUS or resign ourselves to permanent injustice. Take your pick.

SCOTUS Just Set the Stage for Republicans to Steal the Election

WI Primary Vote Goes Ahead After Ruling by State Supreme Court; SCOTUS Throws Out Mail-in Ballot Extension #CoronavirusRoundup 

Federal employees seeking to take up age discrimination suits against their employer just got an assist from SCOTUS.

New: Federal appeals court allows Texas executive order restricting abortion access during pandemic to remain in effect. Will SCOTUS get another COVID-19 related emergency petition soon? calls the opinion "un @PPFAonscionable ". @caroline_mkelly 

As the tentacles of late stage #Capitalism  feed itself, #DementiaJoe  encouraged people 2 roll the dice with #COVID19 ; Wisconson's GOP, with SCOTUS assist, consolidates more power & suppresses. Both figure out how LITTLE 2 give back 2the taxpayers who fund them #BernieSanders2020 

tweet picture

NEW: Texas Democrats file lawsuit against Gov. Abbott & TX election officials to allow all vote by mail in the state, specifically citing disorganization in Wisconsin, yesterday's SCOTUS decision, & uncertainty around virus spread & social distancing.


Most relevant

I was beaten, left bloody & unconscious while friends of mine gave their lives to ensure that every person has the right to register & vote. But five years ago the SCOTUS Shelby County v Holder decision stuck a dagger in the heart of the Voting Rights Act. We must #RestoreTheVRA 

Why is Dem house now getting cold feet abt moving ahead w impeachment trial? They want 2hijack Senate process+muck up senate/SCOTUS schedule U need some consideration abt SCOTUS since Chief Justice presides in Senate. R they worried their articles r too weak to move fwd?

I hope my candidates win, but if not, I'll still cherish my right to vote. I won't scream at ppl in restaurants, scratch on doors of SCOTUS, urge ppl to blow up gov't bldgs, threaten to leave country, or cry like a 5 year old. I'll just work harder next time. What about you?

Alabama killed a Muslim man tonight who wanted his imam by his side when he died. The state offered a Christian chaplain or nothing. It was one of the most clear-cut cases of religious discrimination in recent memory. And SCOTUS’ conservatives didn’t care. So he died alone.

Christine Blasey Ford courageously stepped forward to tell her story — it is a credible and serious allegation. The Senate has a constitutional responsibility to scrutinize SCOTUS nominees. A vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination must be delayed until there is a thorough investigation.

Trump's personal lawyer has sworn under oath that POTUS directed him to commit a federal crime. The Senate must reject any SCOTUS nominee from a president who is an alleged criminal co-conspirator—especially when that nominee may rule to protect Trump from any accountability.

BREAKING: SCOTUS has upheld Trump’s Muslim ban. This is not the first time the Court has been wrong, or has allowed official racism and xenophobia to continue rather than standing up to it. History has its eyes on us — and will judge today’s decision harshly. #NoMuslimBanEver 

Judge Kavanaugh’s refusal to say a POTUS must comply w a duly issued subpoena & Mr Cohen’s implication of POTUS in a federal crime make the danger of Kavanaugh's nomination to the SCOTUS abundantly clear. It's a game changer & Chairman Grassley should delay confirmation hearings

We’re witnessing a Friday night document massacre. President Trump’s decision to step in at the last moment and hide 100k pages of Judge Kavanaugh’s records from the American public is not only unprecedented in the history of SCOTUS noms, it has all the makings of a cover up.

Significant development -- 3 Senate Dems say they have new evidence SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh was not truthful under oath in 2006 confirmation. This is the kind of thing that would be the end of the road in the Senate for many nominees to even minor jobs. But for SCOTUS?