Results for Ayodhya

Add to feed Create your own feed

Latest

After Ayodhya and Article 370, BJP plans campaign on NRC (reports @smritikak )

tweet picture

Engagement with countries on Ayodhya verdict ‘largely successful’: Government

tweet picture

Congress wants grand temple to be built in Ayodhya: Sachin Pilot Download the ET App:

Shia cleric: Filing review plea against Ayodhya verdict would be insensible

tweet picture

#Breaking | TIMES NOW has confronted PFI Secretary over #AyodhyaProvocation ’. He has justified the demand (reject SC verdict) and said that the justice is not delivered in Ayodhya verdict. Listen in. | #AyodhyaProvocation 

“Everyone has welcomed the decision and the Congress Party wants a grand temple be built there [Ayodhya],” said Sachin Pilot

From Katihar to Kashmir, Islamist fringe are trying to incite communal violence by putting posters against SC’s verdict on Ayodhya case. TIMES NOW’s Pradeep Dutta with the ground details from J&K. | #AyodhyaProvocation 

A braver Indian Supreme Court might have ruled for the Muslim side in the controversial Ayodhya case, but such a decision could have prompted riots and open religious warfare, writes @tunkuv 

Loading
Loading

Most relevant

The Honourable Supreme Court has given its verdict on the Ayodhya issue. This verdict shouldn’t be seen as a win or loss for anybody. Be it Ram Bhakti or Rahim Bhakti, it is imperative that we strengthen the spirit of Rashtra Bhakti. May peace and harmony prevail!

SAyodhya Judgment'>C’s Ayodhya Judgment is notable because: It highlights that any dispute can be amicably solved in the spirit of due process of law. It reaffirms the independence, transparency and farsightedness of our judiciary. It clearly illustrates everybody is equal before the law.

I will be in Ayodhya on November 23rd, and soon after in Varanasi to visit Kashi Vishvanath for on the spot investigation.

The only concession Virat Hindus can make for Muslims is permit existing 11 mosques in Ayodhya city limits, which presently have goats and bovine feeding there, to be renovated and namaz allowed. Muslims remember that no temples are allowed in most Islamic countries

IT is time to remember today the long memory of the Ram Bhakts who from 1528 never gave up striving for the restoration of Ram Temple at Ayodhya. We have records of 1853, 1857, 1885, 1934 1949, 1986-1991, and the court battles since 1950 till yesterday.

Now that building the Ram Temple in Ayodhya is on autopilot, the nation must focus on how to stop and turn the daily slide down of the economy to a crash.

Whatever SC decides in the Ram Temple matter, the government has the Brahmastra of nationalisation under Article 300A of the Constitution and paying compensation to winner but not give the land. Of total Ayodhya 67.703 acres, SC purview is only over 0.313 acre that is disputed

In 1991 I said Govt doesn’t needGovernor’s Report for dismissing a state Govt. Then I got dismissed DMK Govt.Then on Art 370 I argued that we don’t need Const Amendment. Proved right again. Now I say Govt does not need SC ok to build Ram Temple in Ayodhya. Will Namo do it?

I have already given to SC complete and irrefutable arguments why Ram Mandir in Ayodhya where it was before butchers from Afghanistan (Babar) demolished it. Muslims now 99% agree. So anytime Ram Mandir

Super!! Namo began his speech at Ayodhya stating that “I speak on Maryada Purushottam Ram’s turf and which land is our pride”( my translation). This is enough

Loading
Loading