1. Politics
  2. Andres Oppenheimer
  3. the question is not whether lopez obrador is adhering to mexico's constitution's reference to "non-intervention," but whether he's not violating the constitution's art. 89 demand to work for the "protection and promotion of human rights.”see:
The question is not whether Lopez Obrador is adhering to Mexico's Constitution's reference to "non-intervention," but whether he's not violating the Constitution's Art. 89 demand to work for the "protection and promotion of human rights.”See: https://t.co/c6SFyfVFFX @MiamiHerald
The question is not whether Lopez Obrador is adhering to Mexico's Constitution's reference to 'non-intervention,' but whether he's not violating the Constitution's Art. 89 demand to work for the 'protection and promotion of human rights.”See: https://t.co/c6SFyfVFFX  @MiamiHerald

Comments

Total(1) => 0.062059164047241 f_f_QM(2) => 0.046285152435303 indS(1) => 0.019653081893921 indM(1) => 0.00032806396484375 f_u_GN(1) => 0.00021100044250488 f_f_dT(11) => 0.0020158290863037 f_f_pTL(1) => 0.0019810199737549