137,517 followers   •   1,007 following   •   Washington, DC   •   http://thinkprogress.org
Editor @thinkprogress. Views mine. jlegum@thinkprogress.org
Latest Scoops
discrimination is also illegal in a lot of cases. But CPAC statement clearly rejects the view
8. Some liberals disagree. It doesn't make them snowflakes or enemies of free speech.
7. Conservative "free speech" advocates simply believe that racists, sexists and other kind of bigots should get lots of access
6. Both conservatives and liberals draw lines here, neither is for unfettered access to big platforms not matter how heinous you are
5. But as the Milo incident reveals, they believe certain kinds of speech should not be given a platform
4. Conservatives pretend their insistence on providing platforms to disgusting people is about free speech, not content
3. CPAC wasn't supporting free speech by inviting Milo, it isn't attacking free speech by canceling
2. Free speech does not entitle you to a particular platform. I'd like to share my options at Super Bowl halftime. Instead I have Twitter.
1. Milo reveals the mythology behind the "free speech" debate
Texas hunters who blamed immigrants actually shot each other, cops say https://t.co/2LQEjklXbs
Texas hunters who blamed immigrants actually shot each other, cops say https://t.co/2LQEjklXbs
Trump caught lying about how much golf he played, in 3 parts
Trump caught lying about how much golf he played, in 3 parts
Conservatives draw the line at the sexualization of kids https://t.co/N2UgUE2lct
Conservatives draw the line at the sexualization of kids https://t.co/N2UgUE2lct
we also contacted Cohen but he didn't get back to us. I'd be interested in speaking with him
I was responding to Jim's tweet, which described the activity as bringing "chaos"
Question for right-wing "free speech" advocates: Should Berkeley still be required to host Milo? Or was that just last week?
Showing up at a town hall organized by your member of Congress and expressing your views is not "chaos"

It's democracy.https://t.co/kPLiL3WrSd
your post doesn't even begin to consider the argument. Even under the narrow definition, plenty of evidence against Trump
Alex Jones and Trump talk on the phone. 🙃🙃🙃 https://t.co/GcELoNmIWD
Alex Jones and Trump talk on the phone. 🙃🙃🙃 https://t.co/GcELoNmIWD
unclear. but I think it would be very difficult to get from GOP, TBH
for foreign emoluments, yes. But he has not gotten it.
Total(1) => 0.58724689483643 f_u_GLN(2) => 0.58234071731567 f_f_QM(2) => 0.49464821815491 indS(2) => 0.067936897277832 indM(2) => 0.040565013885498 indM_1(2) => 0.0050649642944336 indM_2(2) => 0.0011498928070068 indM_4(2) => 0.017626047134399 indM_5(2) => 0.005295991897583 indM_6(2) => 0.0050129890441895 indM_7(2) => 0.002866268157959 indM_8(2) => 0.00118088722229 f_f_pTL(2) => 0.014130830764771 f_f_dT(40) => 0.012820720672607